Tag Archive for: supplementation

The Supplementation Sweet Spot, Part Two

/in /by

We’ve got the beginning of our sweet spot for supplementation started with a multivitamin-multimineral and probiotics; today I’ll finish it up with two more—depending.

Omega-3 Fatty Acids

Recommendations on the type of omega-3s seem to be in flux with disagreements over docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). The cause for concern seems to be the potential relationship between DHA and atrial fibrillation. I’m still not satisfied as to the relevancy of the risk in the general population with one exception: those people who’ve had myocardial infarctions (heart attacks) that resulted in the loss of heart muscle. For now, those people may want to be cautious. My research continues and when I have an answer, so will you.

Unless you regularly eat servings of cold-water fish two or three times a week, part of your foundation supplementation should be 1–3 grams of EPA, DHA, or the plant-sourced alpha linoleic acid (ALA), or a combination of all three. You can pick any body system, and omega-3s are most likely beneficial. This is especially true of the cardiovascular and nervous systems.

Vitamin D

The final foundation supplement that makes up our sweet spot is vitamin D but with a catch. Instead of taking massive amounts of vitamin D, the best way to determine whether you need to supplement with vitamin D is to get your blood levels checked via a 25 hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) blood test. If you’re low in vitamin D, below 30 ng/mL, add more vitamin D to your supplements in 50 mcg (2,000 IU) increments until your blood level reaches 40–60 ng/mL. Obviously, you need to see your doctor for the test, but you should be seeing your doctor regularly anyway.

Depending on where you live, sunlight will help you maintain healthy vitamin D levels with about 15 minutes exposure per day. However, in Northern areas such as here in Grand Rapids, that only happens about half the year, so we make sure to take our vitamin D supplement and bump it up a little in winter.

More

Vitamin D has become controversial with the current COVID-19 outbreak. Vitamin D will not prevent you from catching COVID-19; it will help reduce the severity of symptoms. But megadosing on vitamin D can have consequences that can result in bone loss. That’s why basing your intake on a blood test is the right way to go.

The Bottom Line

There you have the sweet spot for foundation supplements that all of us need, regardless of the quality of our diet. What about all those other supplements out there? Fine tuning supplementation to meet your personal needs is where supplements get complicated and need to be personalized. With the billions of dollars spent on supplements every year, if everyone began with the sweet spot of foundation nutrients, everyone would be better off, just like the sweet spots for diet and exercise.

If you want to know more about the science behind these supplements as well as how to assess a quality manufacturer, get a digital copy of Supplementing Your Diet; if you want to pass along the information to others, get a 5-pack of CDs at reduced prices. They’re all on sale at 25% off, and that’s in addition to Member and Insider discounts. You can also find info on supplementation for other conditions such as high blood pressure, pregnancy, migraines, weight loss, and more at the Store at drchet.com.

What are you prepared to do today?

        Dr. Chet

Identifying the Supplementation Sweet Spot

/in /by

I believe everyone should add a foundation of supplements to their diet, but there’s no reason to take supplements you don’t need. The last two weeks, I’ve written about the sweet spot for nutrition and exercise as I see it, so it just seems logical to do the same thing for dietary supplements. While supplementation can be very complex, there’s a foundation where we all begin. To me, that’s the sweet spot.

It all begins with a multivitamin-multimineral. With the gaps we have in our diet and with research confirming the gaps, that’s where we should start, but how to choose? Your ideal daily multivitamin-multimineral would have at least the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) for all the major vitamins and minerals. It should also have a blend of dehydrated plant material to provide the phytonutrients we’d get in plants if we ate them. That’s it. Too many brands on the market throw in herbs for men’s health or women’s health. Not everyone needs them, so why put them in a foundation supplement?

The second nutrient is actually not a nutrient; it’s probiotics. If we don’t eat enough raw or fermented foods, we’re not adding to our microbiome; adding a probiotic supplement will help build a stronger, more effective microbiome. Does the number of strains matter? No, but it’s better with strains shown by research to be beneficial. Do the colony forming units (CFUs) matter? Again, no. What does matter is whether it contains a prebiotic or not, typically a fiber such as inulin. Because our diets are poor in this food source, purchase one that contains prebiotics.

Those two supplements are the foundation of nutrition for people of every age and condition; there are two more that most people probably need, and we’ll talk about those on Saturday. If you’re interested in more of the science behind my choices, pick up a copy of Supplementing Your Diet as either a download for yourself or the CDs to share with others. They’re all on sale at 25% off, and that’s in addition to Member and Insider discounts.

What are you prepared to do today?

        Dr. Chet

Planning Your Infrastructure Upgrade

/in /by

In order to give you some ideas to help you focus on your body’s infrastructure, I’m going to share my list. I’ll give you my issues and why I feel they’re problems for me; I hope that will stimulate your thinking so you can determine your infrastructure upgrades for 2021. I don’t know that I can accomplish all of them in a single year, but I do know I can make a good start, and that’s what I’m hoping you will do as well.

Increase Muscle Mass

If there’s one getting-older issue that I completely underestimated, it’s the loss of muscle mass. It just sort of crept up on me and while I can’t quantify it in terms of pounds or percentage, I know I’ve lost strength in my upper body, and my legs seem to be a shadow of their former selves. Part of the reason that my legs lost so much mass, I believe, is directly tied to my inability to run consistently. I have no idea when I’ll be able to run freely again, if ever, so strength training is going to be critical to increase strength if not mass.

Improve Skin Quality

I have to confess that I never examine my skin. I don’t spend a lot of time looking at my face in the mirror, and I ignore my arms completely. But lately I’ve noticed that my skin is thinner and a slight scrape against the door frame that doesn’t even hurt can leave a huge purple spot. I’m not trying to recreate the quality of skin I had in my 20s, but I know it can be better than it is. (Has anyone in my household been nagging me about this for years? Um, maybe.)

Decrease Body Fat

The one that drives me crazy is the increase in body fat around my waist. I weigh 45 pounds less than my highest body weight ever, yet my waist circumference is greater now than it was then. The reasons are complicated, from the loss of muscle mass reducing metabolic rate to the gradual reduction in hormones as I get older. I know that there’s no such thing as spot reduction, and I don’t know if the general rule “you lose it first from where you put it on last” applies as you get older. But aside from increasing muscle mass, this one is just not acceptable and is a priority for me.

Increase Bone Mass

I’ve made no secret of the fact that I have osteopenia. In fact, I’m one-tenth of a Z-score from having osteoporosis. I have improved my vitamin D and calcium intake since my last bone-density test. I’ll find out in April whether that has resulted in any change. I’m not interested in continuing to be the amazing shrinking man, so this is an internal infrastructure change that must happen in 2021.

Improve Posture and Balance

This one seems a lot less obvious, but it’s still critical to overall health. Why? Because working on improving posture now, which means resetting the resting “tone” of the postural muscles will help with balance as we get older, and balance is critical if we hope to make it to an advanced age. The inner ear is part of it, but our ability to be able to move and do the things that we want to do can be dramatically impacted by poor balance. The modifications in muscle mass and fat mass, as well as bone mass, will have an impact, but it’s also critical to specifically work on posture and balance movements as well.

The Bottom Line

There you have it: my infrastructure plan for 2021. I’ve begun working on some, but there’s still research to read to find better solutions. That will include different approaches to exercise, whether weight training, stretching, or aerobic exercise. There could be specific dietary approaches that apply rather than just cutting calories. Supplementing with nutrient isolates and specific dietary supplements may also be part of the solution.

How about you? You may have cholesterol and HbA1c that needs to get lowered, cardiac output that needs to increase, and a microbiome overhaul; maybe you need to build strength in specific areas to compensate for arthritis and loss of cartilage.

Identify your three to five areas and write them down. As the year progresses, I’ll share the solutions I’ve found with you because my goal hasn’t changed: to help you become the best version of yourself. Specify where you want to go and let’s get started.

What are you prepared to do today?

        Dr. Chet

Should You Try Prescription Fish Oil?

/in /by

The final marketing point that the prescription fish oil supplement makes is that the DHA omega-3 fatty acid found in many heart healthy fish oil blends may raise LDL-cholesterol. That’s the cholesterol, known as the lousy cholesterol, associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease.

Based on the studies I read, there may be a small increase in LDL-cholesterol in some studies. What they fail to mention is that there’s more than one type of LDL-cholesterol. The small, dense LDL cholesterol has been shown to be associated in CVD even when LDL-cholesterol is in the normal range; the large and fluffy LDL-cholesterol seems to have no relationship with CVD. The supplement fish oils that contain DHA seem to raise only the large LDL-cholesterol. That has led other researchers to call the effect of fish oil on LDL to be cardioprotective at best and benign at worst.

The Issues with the Marketing of Rx Fish Oil

Every company wants to put their best foot forward and prescription fish oil is no different. In reviewing the marketing materials as well as the research, here are my concerns:

  • The results of the studies they cite show a decrease in triglycerides of 33%. The mean level of triglycerides in one of the studies was about 660 mg/dl. That means it dropped the mean level to 440 mg/dl. While statistically significant, there’s no way to know whether that’s clinically significant in reducing the overall risk of CVD because the studies were so short.
  • The company clearly states that this medication is clinically relevant only to people with triglycerides greater 500 mg/dl; that’s a very small percentage of patients who may have familial high cholesterol. For the typical person with high triglycerides, this medication is not appropriate. That doesn’t mean it’s illegal to prescribe it for people with triglycerides between 250 and 500, but there’s also no evidence that it’s better than a change in diet or exercise. Will it be prescribed only for people with high triglycerides? We’ll see.
  • The company did not run comparative studies against fish oil supplements or with diet and exercise alone. Seems like that would be obvious.
  • Finally, while there are programs to get this medication for lower prices, I checked with my prescription plan and the cost would be $375 per month. For that kind of money, you can have someone prepare healthy meals specifically designed to reduce your triglycerides or take a class to learn to prepare them yourself; you could definitely join and inexpensive gym and buy more fresh fruits and vegetables.

The Bottom Line

Similar to statin medications when they were introduced decades ago, prescription fish oil should be limited to a very specific part of the population with familial high triglycerides. That’s all—no one else.

As for fish oil supplements, the issues they point out in their marketing material are not significant. You never use dietary supplements to treat any disease, but that doesn’t mean they can’t help you compensate for nutritional deficiencies. There will be a difference in the quality of any supplement so make sure you choose a quality manufacturer.

For the bulk of the population to reduce their triglycerides, reducing refined carbohydrates, saturated fats, and alcohol, increasing vegetable and fruit intake, and getting some exercise will help most. Like I always say: Eat better. Eat less. Move more.

What are you prepared to do today?

        Dr. Chet

References:
1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.08.005.
2. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Aug 1;103(8):2909-2917.
3. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 Apr;79(4):558-63.

Fish Oil: Medication versus Supplements

/in /by

Before I address the concerns about fish oil supplements put forth by the Vascepa® prescription omega-3 website, it’s important to understand that all prescription and over-the-counter medications have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). That means they have spent a significant amount of money—sometimes over $1 billion—to prove that the treatment claims are significant, and you can’t take that away from them. But marketing is a different story, so let’s look at what they say.

“Fish oil supplements are not FDA-approved.” True; no dietary supplement is FDA-approved, but that doesn’t mean they’re not regulated. They also can’t make claims about curing diseases.

“Daily dose could require 10 to 40 capsules to equal the prescription EPA omega-3.” That depends on the brand purchased, so that critique is weak.

“Fish oil supplements can leave a fish-y aftertaste.” Really? It’s fish oil, what would you expect? (Keeping the supplements in the refrigerator may help with that as well as taking fish oil before meals.) They suggest that the oils turn rancid and that causes the taste, but they offer no proof of that claim.

The last critique they make of fish oil supplements is that “Many contain another omega-3 fatty acid called DHA.” They say DHA can raise LDL cholesterol. I’ll address that claim and provide some concerns I have with the prescription omega-3 and how it’s being marketed on Saturday.

What are you prepared to do today?

        Dr. Chet

Treatment for High Triglycerides

/in /by

Hypertriglyceridemia, the medical term for high triglycerides, is a risk for cardiovascular disease. Recently I spotted a health headline from a medical newsletter that read “Omega-3 Fatty Acid Medications Can Boost Cardiovascular Health.” The word that caught my attention was “medications” so I checked it out.

The article described the benefits of recently approved medications based on marine omega-3 fatty acids. I checked out the latest one called Vascepa®. This is a purified form of fish oil that, according to the data on its website, can lower triglycerides up to 33%. Sounds impressive.

Back to the newsletter article: the author interviewed the lead author of a review paper that stated that prescription omega-3s are effective in lowering high triglycerides. Then she went on to say to avoid omega-3s from dietary supplements because they haven’t been proven to lower triglycerides as the prescription omega-3s have.

The website for Vascepa went a lot further in criticizing omega-3 supplements. What were their objections? Is a prescription the best way to go to treat hypertriglyceridemia? That’s what I’ll cover the rest of this week.

What are you prepared to do today?

        Dr. Chet

Reference: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/326146.php

Food Is Better Than Supplements, But …

/in /by

Getting your nutrients from food by eating a healthy diet is the most desirable way of getting vitamins, minerals, and phytonutrients. Period. If we could all do it, no question that’s the best way. But you and I don’t live in some fantasy world. We’re busy. We don’t always have enough time to shop and cook healthy meals. Dietary supplements have helped fill the nutrition gap.

What should we think about this latest research? Should we stop taking supplements, especially calcium? Before I give you my opinion, I want to tell you that I emailed the corresponding author of the paper, a brilliant woman and a talented researcher. I had two questions about the study. She answered me the same evening—Saturday night before Easter. That I got such quick reply was remarkable; I’m still waiting for answers from other researchers I contacted months ago.

The first question I asked was a basic one: what was the mortality rate of the subjects in the study compared with the national cancer mortality rate? The national mortality rate is 156 deaths per 100,000 people per year. That works out to 1.6 people per 1,000. The rate in the study was about 3 people per 1,000. She replied that the study results are not directly comparable for complicated reasons.

But here’s something that can be directly compared. A 62% increase in cancer mortality would be transferable to national statistics because that’s the idea: to generalize to the entire population. A 62% increase means that 2.5 people per 1,000 would die from cancer in a given year instead of 1.6. When applied to the entire population that could be a lot of people, but it applies only to those who took over 1,000 mg of calcium per day.

The other question I asked was whether they had data on how long the people were taking the supplements; NHANES asked about the 30 days prior and recorded the prior 24 hours. How long were they taking the supplements? Weeks? Months? Years? Decades? That might have made some difference. The data were collected in the questionnaires used for two of the cycles that I examined, but that data was not used in the analysis.


The Bottom Line

I think we should eat the best diet we can. I also think we should use quality dietary supplements to complement our diet. This study was an exercise in statistics more than nutrition. It can tell us the statistical outcomes of the people in the study, but it can’t really be used to tell us anything about what we should do as individuals.

Not every person who took a higher amount of calcium died from cancer. On top of that, if supplementation did have a significant negative impact on our health, it stands to reason there would have been more negative results than just for calcium. Because the research questions were fitted to the available data, there’s just too much we don’t know about factors that can influence the results.

Another good question the study didn’t ask is why people were taking calcium. For instance, a woman with osteoporosis may take calcium for better bone health. Did those women have fewer broken bones with supplementation? If so, that might be worth any higher risk that exists. As with any nutritional intervention, it’s important to weigh the pros and cons. If you’re concerned, talk to your healthcare professional about what you should do; they know you and your health status and can help you make the right choices.

Supplement confusion is a good reason to get a copy of my new CD Supplementing Your Diet. Check out why at drchet.com.

What are you prepared to do today?

        Dr. Chet

Reference: Ann Intern Med. doi:10.7326/M18-2478.

Food vs. Supplements: A Closer Look

/in /by

There’s no question National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) has done the best job of collecting data on nutritional intake in large-scale studies. I’ve applauded it in the past, and I’m not going to change now just because there’s an NHANES-based paper that critiques the use of supplements. NHANES data were used by one of the co-authors of the current research paper we’re examining; in that study, they demonstrated regular use of a multivitamin-multimineral can compensate for deficiencies in our diet.

What could explain the same data showing potential benefits and hazards of supplements? Two reasons in my opinion. First, the research questions were not part of the original study; that’s supported by the fact that the lead author would have been six or seven years old when data collection began.

Imagine you apply for a loan. You’d give the bank all kinds of financial data: your total earnings, where you work, what you owe, and so on. Then imagine that researchers take all that very accurate data and estimate your hourly wage. They could be right on the money or way off, because they don’t know how many hours you worked; that wasn’t one of the questions. It’s the same with the data in this study; the researchers can make a great guess from the data they have, but the question they’re trying to answer wasn’t one of the original questions asked so their guess may be very far from correct. That happens often in these retrospective studies.

Second, the bulk of the researchers were experts in statistics and epidemiology. The statistical analysis accounted for 11 factors to numerically make the data comparable. We can’t really know what that does to modify the data instead of collecting data on actual variables.

Still worried? I’ll finish this up on Saturday.

What are you prepared to do today?

        Dr. Chet

Reference: Ann Intern Med. doi:10.7326/M18-2478.

Food vs. Supplements

/in /by

Last week, the health headlines blared that nutrients from foods were better than nutrients from supplements—specifically that excess calcium from supplements was associated with an increased risk of dying from cancer. That will get your attention if you take supplemental calcium, especially if you’re taking calcium because your physician told you to take it because you have osteopenia or osteoporosis. Let’s take a closer look at this study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

Researchers examined data collected for the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) on food intake and supplement use. NHANES data are now collected every two years, so they selected six consecutive cycles and tracked the all-cause mortality from subjects in those data. They found that in over 30,000 adults over 20 years of age tracked for six years, there were 3,613 deaths with 805 from cancer.

The researchers then examined the food intake and supplement use of the subjects from the prior 30 days of data collection with mortality data. That’s where they discovered that in the subjects who died from cancer, there was a 62% greater risk if they took more than 1,000 mg of supplemental calcium per day. The overall conclusion was that nutrients from foods are better than nutrients from supplements; in addition, some supplements may be hazardous.

Should you start chucking out your calcium supplements? We’ll take a closer look at this study the rest of this week.

What are you prepared to do today?

        Dr. Chet

Reference: Ann Intern Med. doi:10.7326/M18-2478.

Supplementing Your Diet

/in /by

Last week, a study was published that concluded that nutrients from food are better than nutrients from supplements. Does that mean you can throw out the supplements and just eat more? Short answer: no.

Did you ever notice that one week some vitamin is good for you and the next it’s supposed to be bad for you? Why is that? One reason is the way nutrition research is done.

One of the most popular audios I’ve ever made was Supplements Made Simple, so now I’ve updated all the tracks and included a section about the problems with nutrition research.

Introducing Supplementing Your Diet—Why, What, and Who. This CD examines the issues related to dietary supplements in the 21st century. The first question is simply why do we need them? Can’t we get enough nutrients from the food we eat? I’ll address that question from a variety of perspectives, including those based on your physiology and biochemistry.

What about the research that says supplements aren’t necessary and are a waste of money? As I said, I’ll tackle that issue head on with three specific reasons too much research on supplements is flawed and yields misleading conclusions.

If you do need to supplement your diet, where do you begin? I’ll explain the four supplements everyone should take and the reasons why.

Finally, how do you decide which company to buy supplements from? I’ll give you five characteristics that distinguish a high-quality manufacturer. That will help you choose the company whose supplements are best for you. This audio cuts through the forest of obstacles to help you see things clearly so you can make an informed decision on how to supplement your diet.

All this information is just $9.95 plus shipping and handling.

And if you’re in the supplement business, this audio will answer your potential clients’ questions about the basics. If you want to grow your supplement business, I’ve included special pricing on five copies of this CD so you can loan them to clients to help them make their decisions. You can point them to my online bio to show them why they can rely on my explanations.

Enjoy this holiday weekend, and I’ll be back Tuesday.

What are you prepared to do today?

        Dr. Chet