Tag Archive for: smartphone

Not So Smartphones

/in /by

Many variables that were included in the smartphone study weren’t reported, and there’s a good reason for that: they were non-significant. I don’t mean not statistically significant—I mean not significant in the real world either. In fact, I don’t think I’ve ever seen a study with so many variables that were non-significant.

The one that surprised me the most was that simple tracking of blood pressure or the use of the artificial intelligence (AI) application did not change the percentage of people who took their BP medications regularly. Neither approach shifted the scale one little bit. I would have expected that at least some people would have started taking their meds regularly, but they didn’t in either group. In next Tuesday’s Memo, I’m going to give you a good reason to take your meds based on a recent COVID-19 study.

Many of the variables were from questionnaires, and as I often remind you, self-reporting is always suspect. But it raised a few questions about the reported results.

Questions

The first question I had was related to the statistical analysis they ran. Instead of looking for differences within groups, they ran comparisons only between groups. I’m not saying that any differences were profound, but it did appear that there were some that were interesting.

For example, the control group demonstrated no differences in servings of processed meats per week, but the app group decreased servings by about one-half portion. The servings of sugar-sweetened beverages decreased by about a half-portion per week as well, while there were no changes in the control group. That would seem to be a benefit and if a statistical analysis were run, it might have been statistically significant—take a win wherever you can get it. You shouldn’t overstate the findings, but it does support the idea that reminders about a healthier diet might be effective.

I don’t understand why the researchers used an application that was being beta-tested for use in the study. If the number of subjects was limited, and AI requires a lot more data points to really “learn” enough to decide what the subjects need to know and how best to present it to them, it seems the study was destined to fail before it began. If they had called it a pilot study to gain insight to propose a major clinical trial, that would be more logical because that’s what pilot studies are for: to decide whether larger studies are warranted. They came to the same conclusion, but focused on what they didn’t show instead of what they did.

The Bottom Line

The use of smartphones, tablets, and laptops together with applications designed to monitor health are growing in use. Paula recently had a consultation with a specialist and her first telemed physical. I think there’s a place for these types of electronic services, especially during this unusual time. But no matter how many subjects are used to train AI, I think it will always stop short of what they hope applications will do, because there’s no app that will get people to do what they don’t want to do. No logic. No mini-goal setting. No reasoning.

I always thought that education was the key. It isn’t. Even with my education, I have trouble doing the things that I know I should do for my health. The willingness to change has to come from within. Until people have that, no program, person, or application will help them achieve their health goals. It’s wrapped up in the third word in my tagline: what are YOU prepared to do today? It is and always be your choice.

Because we’ve talked about blood pressure all week and more is coming next week, this seems like an obvious time to offer you my High Blood Pressure download at half price; only a few CDs are left, also half price, and when they’re gone, they’re gone. Members and Insiders who log in first will get their discounts as well.

What are you prepared to do today?

        Dr. Chet

References:
1. https://bit.ly/39OmUCc.
2. JAMA Open. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0255.

Limitations of the Smartphone BP App

/in /by

In the examination of a smartphone application to help lower blood pressure, the results were a little surprising. Take a look at the graphic representation above of the study, including the results. More and more journals are going to that type of graphic summary. They’re great summaries, but they don’t always tell the entire story.

A quick review on blood pressure: systolic is the upper number and indicates the pressure when your heart is beating; diastolic is the lower number and indicates the pressure when your heart is resting. The ideal BP range is 110/70 to 120/80.

In this case, as you could see on the graphic, there was a difference of only 3 mmHg in systolic BP between those using the AI-generated coaching application and those who didn’t use that app. One of the discussion points was that the number of subjects was not great enough to be able to discern the significance of less than a 5 mmHg difference in BP. Achieving statistical significance is pretty much irrelevant in the real world if the difference between the approaches was so small. Yes, in a population of 50 million, a 1 mmHg drop in systolic BP may save some lives, but who do you really want tracking your BP: an artificial presence or your physician?

What really caught my attention was that both approaches worked. The overall decrease in the AI group was 8.3 mmHg versus 6.8 mmHg in the control group. There were decreases in diastolic BP as well. Whether it was the automated BP reporting alone or not, it appeared that just paying attention got results. But that’s not all I got out of the study. I’ll let you know more on Saturday. By the way, how you coming along with your new habit?

What are you prepared to do today?

        Dr. Chet

References:
1. https://bit.ly/39OmUCc.
2. JAMA Open. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0255.

Get Health Support via Your Smartphone

/in /by

Paula has an appointment with her primary care doctor this morning, and she’ll be right here on the sofa when it happens. Telemedicine is now a part of everyday life, but your phone can be an asset to your health even beyond speaking to your doctor.

For example, hypertension is still a significant problem in the U.S., and it’s directly related to heart disease, stroke, and kidney disease. The typical treatments are medications, diet, and exercise. The problem is that too many people don’t follow through consistently enough to help themselves. Before I go any further, here’s a hypothetical: Imagine an application for your smartphone that would record your blood pressure and help you with diet and exercise recommendations and tracking; would that help you and others lower mild hypertension?

That’s what a group of physicians and public health officials in the Chicago area wondered. In the Smart Hypertension Control Study, they scanned more than 2,700 electronic medical records to find just over 300 people with mild hypertension to take part in a study comparing two different approaches to managing hypertension. Both the experimental group and the control groups used home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) that could be reported automatically after it was taken with a Bluetooth connection to a smartphone. The experimental group used a smartphone app—a hypertension personal control program (HPCP).

The application used artificial intelligence to provide reminders and feedback along with diet and exercise information. The primary outcome was a difference in BP between the groups; I’ll tell you more about the results on Thursday. Until then, pick one single habit, such as taking your temperature or washing your hands, and through Saturday see how regularly you do that.

Hypertension is bad any time, but with a virus that seems to kill people with preexisting conditions, this is a great time to improve your habits.

What are you prepared to do today?

        Dr. Chet

Reference: JAMA Open.doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0255.