ACE2 Receptors: Gateway for COVID-19

The number of cases of COVID-19 continues to rise and rise and rise. As restrictions on shopping, dining, and entertainment have been reduced, and then sometimes reinstated, the debate over which businesses should be open, social distancing, and even whether to wear a mask continues. Let me make it simple for you: wear your mask to protect others from you and you from them. Period.

There has also been a tremendous rise in the research on COVID-19, specifically, the short-term and long-term effects of the virus on the body. This virus is different from others; it isn’t as simple is getting the flu or a severe cough, and then life returns to normal after a week or so. Research is finding some significant long-lasting effects on the body. The locations impacted seem to contain high numbers of the ACE2 receptor, the receptor used by the virus to enter our cells. We already knew the sinuses, lungs, and adjoining blood vessels contain significant numbers of ACE2 receptors as well as the kidneys.

Researchers for a data analytics company examined every published paper, over 100 million of them, to find out where ACE2 receptors have been found and then performed an analysis examining every potential interaction, over 45 quadrillion of them. They found that there are significant numbers of receptors on the tongue, the nasal passages, and the ciliated passages to the lungs. The most significant find was the enterocytes that line the small intestine. That means that should the virus get to those locations, it can potentially wreak havoc there. We’ll talk about some of the organs and systems that have been impacted by COVID-19 the next two days.

What are you prepared to do today?

        Dr. Chet

Reference: eLife 2020;9:e58040 DOI: 10.7554/eLife.58040

Spice Up Your Life and Be Healthier

Before I get into this memo any further, keep in mind there were only 12 subjects in this study, and we don’t change our recommendations for an entire society based on a limited numbers of subjects. We just have to recognize that this is a preliminary study. Second, because they examined a large number of variables, the probability of getting a false positive increases.

As long as we keep those in mind, the results were really surprising. Adding spices to a high-fat, high-carbohydrate meal reduced the inflammation caused by that meal. While coconut curry chicken might not be your preference, I’d wager you’ve eaten a bacon cheeseburger with fries and a soft drink at some point. That can easily add up to a similar profile of a high-fat, high-carbohydrate meal. So let’s take a look at the spices.

The Spices

The spice blend included the following spices, but not all dishes contained all the spices. For example, the turmeric was used in the chicken dish while the cinnamon was used in the biscuit:

Turmeric
Ginger
Cinnamon
Oregano
Parsley
Basil
Coriander
Cumin
Red pepper
Rosemary
Black pepper
Bay leaf
Thyme

This is not a magic blend by any means, but each of these spices and herbs have different phytonutrient blends. The magic comes from those phytonutrients. Recall the image of the various sizes of measuring spoons. A teaspoon is 5 grams, a half teaspoon is 2.5 grams, and an eighth of a teaspoon is 0.625 grams. That illustrates how little of a spice you need per serving. Keep that in mind if you decide to spice up your meals.

What we don’t know is whether there’s any interaction between those spices and herbs that would impact the inflammatory hormones. We know that turmeric and ginger have been studied extensively. The researchers recommended testing each spice individually.

Two Observations

There are probably dozens of factors that need to be examined, but two stand out in my mind. First, we’ll need to find out the impact of cooking on each of the different herbs and spices. Does heat destroy the phytonutrients or does it enhance them? We have a partial answer from this study because the spices were put into the dishes as they were being prepared and not added as a topping.

Second, if you take supplements with phytonutrient blends in them, it may be wise to take them either before or while you’re eating so the phytonutrients will be available to help during the digestive process. I’ve always recommended taking your supplements whenever you can remember to take them, and I still stand by that because consistency is more important than timing. But if you can increase the potential benefits by taking them with meals, that’s a good idea.

The Bottom Line

The reason that I loved this approach to research is because it was practical. By that I mean, instead of assessing only one food or a specific group of foods, this study looked at what we would consider “bad foods” together with herbs and spices that are full of phytonutrients to see how they work together.

If you think about it, if saturated fat and refined carbohydrate were as bad as they’re thought to be for the risk of CVD or type 2 diabetes, those diseases would take effect much faster. But perhaps, cake with dark chocolate frosting or French fries with ketchup work with their phytonutrients to somewhat neutralize the bad effect of the food by itself. It doesn’t mean that we don’t bear responsibility; we should still eat as healthy as we can. But perhaps if we choose wisely, we may be able to enjoy some of the food that are perceived as not as healthy if we can spice them just right.

What are you prepared to do today?

        Dr. Chet

Reference: J Nutr 2020;150:1600–1609.

The Health Benefits of Spices

Continuing our look at the research study on the effect of spices on markers of inflammation, there were some interesting results. The high-fat, high-carbohydrate meal was coconut curry chicken, a cornbread muffin, and a biscuit; that strikes me as an odd meal, but you do what you must for research. The only difference was the spices added to allow for comparative results.

Examining the effect of the 1,000-calorie, high-fat, high-carbohydrate meal, the researchers found an increase in the release of inflammatory hormones above baseline in all subjects. So that’s the first result: inflammation was increased after eating the test meal with no spices added.

Compare that to consumption of the same meal with six grams of spice blend: it significantly reduced IL-1β secretion at four hours after the meal compared with the meal with none of the spice blend. Also, IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, and TNF-α secretion after the meal containing six grams of the spice blend was below baseline values for each cytokine (inflammatory hormone). These results suggest that spice consumption may reduce inflammation after a high-fat, high-carbohydrate meal for hours after eating. The paper is Open Access, so you can read it yourself at the link in the references.

Those are interesting results, and I’m guessing you really would like to know which spices were used in the study. I’m going to give you that spice blend and put this research in context in Saturday’s memo. But if you haven’t done our little experiment with the teaspoon, half teaspoon, and eighth teaspoon, please do it before then.

What are you prepared to do today?

        Dr. Chet

Reference: J Nutr 2020;150:1600–1609.

Can Spices Make You Healthier?

I’d like you to do something before you read the rest of this memo. Go to your drawer that contains measuring spoons, and pull out the teaspoon, half teaspoon, and eighth teaspoon. Then measure out salt or sugar for each different volume and put it on a plate. Notice how little there is by the time you get to the eighth teaspoon. Keep that image in your mind for the remainder of the week.

Too often, nutrition research lacks a practical approach; researchers try to drill down into the details before they look at the larger response to any intervention. In other words, examining what people actually eat and cook, then changing something and seeing what happens. I don’t mean exaggerated results such as weight loss, but more subtle effects such as changes in triglycerides, cholesterol, blood sugar, and in this case, markers of inflammation.

This week we’re going to take a look at a recently published paper that took exactly that approach. Researchers selected a group of 12 overweight male subjects with at least one additional risk factor for cardiovascular disease and fed them a high-fat, high-carbohydrate, 1,000-calorie meal. They fed them the same meal on three different days: once without any specific spice blend, second with two grams of a spice blend, and the third time with six grams of the same spice blend. They tested the subjects to see what markers of inflammation were changed after each feeding. I’ll give you the results in Thursday’s memo.

What are you prepared to do today?

        Dr. Chet

Reference: J Nutr 2020;150:1600–1609.

SFCA, Sodium Intake, and High Blood Pressure

Researchers in the United Kingdom recruited people with elevated systolic and diastolic blood pressure for a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study on diet and blood pressure. The scientists put all 145 subjects on a low-sodium diet for six weeks. Half the subjects was given a placebo while the other half was given a slow-release sodium supplement. After six weeks, the subjects were crossed over to the other group for another six weeks. The objective was to see if sodium intake impacted the microbiome and short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) production to reduce blood pressure.

In a perfect world, researchers would take stool samples under all conditions to test for changes in microbe content, but that approach is expensive and time-consuming. Instead they chose to monitor changes in SCFA because they’ve been associated with blood pressure.

Researchers found that while taking the placebo, subjects on the low-sodium diet saw all SCFA increase; 2-methylbutyrate, butyrate, hexanoate, isobutyrate, and valerate were significantly increased. The increases in SCFA were associated with reductions in blood pressure and arterial-wall stretchability.

What does it mean? We’ve known for decades that sodium plays a role in blood pressure. This study demonstrated that sodium reduction directly increased the production of SCFA, which then lowered blood pressure. What we don’t know is the specific beneficial microbes affected or exactly how sodium negatively impacts them. Research continues and I’m sure we’ll find that out eventually.

The Bottom Line

On the other hand, it may not be necessary to find out. Scientists like me always want to know the specific bacteria and the mechanism by how it works. We know that fluid retention is involved somewhere. But we already know that if we reduce sodium, we’ll positively impact our blood pressure. We also know that fiber is the essential food for these SCFA-producing bacteria in our microbiome. If we focus on a more fiber-rich diet as well as take a fiber supplement, we may be able to increase our odds of reducing blood pressure without medication. If we need the meds, we take them, but if we can do it by feeding our microbiome, that’s even better.

What are you prepared to do today?

        Dr. Chet

References:
1. Hypertension. 2020;76:73–79.
2. Benoit Chassaing, Andrew T. Gewirtz, in Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract (Sixth Edition), 2018.

Health Benefits of SCFA

Let’s continue our look at short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) and what they do besides produce energy. Most of these are observational in nature; by that I mean when SCFA go up or down, effects are observed. What we don’t know at this point is why.

For example, when diabetic animals are given the SCFAs acetate and propionate, they maintain better glucose control. That means that adding SCFA to their diet can improve their ability to maintain blood sugar levels. Wait a second; is this the same acetate that’s found in vinegar? Yes. The problem is that the studies don’t provide consistent results.

The same is true for fat storage. When SCFA levels go up, fat storage appears to go down, but drinking vinegar doesn’t necessarily provide that benefit. Observational studies show that as SCFA levels made by the body go up, fat storage goes down. That can prevent weight gain, but we don’t know whether it causes weight loss. The same is true for cholesterol levels; SCFA are associated with lower cholesterol levels.

The problem is that we don’t know the precise mechanisms yet. In other words, what does making SCFA do to the metabolic systems in the body? To the genes? Or receptors for various functions? That’s what scientists are working on. Further, exactly what type of bacteria produce the right SCFA? There’s general agreement that Bifidobacteria produce acetate and propionate when fermenting fiber, but which Bifidobacterium? There are over 50 varieties. Maybe more than one—they may interact in sequence. We don’t know at this point.

What role do SCFA have in controlling blood pressure? Does sodium also have an impact on SCFA production? We’ll take a look at a recent study on Saturday.

What are you prepared to do today?

        Dr. Chet

References:
1. Benoit Chassaing, Andrew T. Gewirtz, in Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract (Sixth Edition), 2018.
2. Front Microbiol. 2016; 7: 925. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00925

Short-Chain Fatty Acids: DIY Nutrition

Short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) are critical to your health and well-being, yet you may not really know where they come from or what they do. In my opinion, the most interesting thing about SCFA is that they’re not generally found in our diet; we make them ourselves! We do that when bacteria in the microbiome work to ferment digestible fiber.

By definition, SCFA contain less than six carbon molecules. The three you may have heard about are acetate, propionate, and butyrate. SCFA can provide us with up to 10% of our energy needs. They’re especially important to colonocytes, a type of endothelial cells of the large intestine that need energy to digest and absorb food that we use to produce the rest of the energy we need.

I’ll cover what else SCFA do on Thursday. In the meantime, one way to increase the production of SCFA is to get more fiber, whether from foods or supplements. It’s especially important after a course of antibiotics; research has shown that after the microbiome is upset by antibiotics, the production of SCFA can be impaired, which impacts many biological processes.

The monthly Insider Conference Call is tomorrow night at 9 p.m. Eastern Time. You can still participate by becoming an Insider by 8 p.m. tomorrow night. If you have questions about COVID-19 or any other health topic, this is your chance to get answers. I hope to talk with you then.

What are you prepared to do today?

        Dr. Chet

Reference: Benoit Chassaing, Andrew T. Gewirtz, in Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract (Sixth Edition), 2018.

Supplementing Your Diet: Supplement Info Now on MP3

More than ever, we live in a digital age. Those of you who are in the supplement business have had to adapt your business to use more electronic tools to survive and thrive.

I did Supplementing Your Diet as a CD with the idea that anyone could use it to help people understand why they need to supplement their diet, where they should begin, and how to select a quality manufacturer. You could lend it to someone, make an appointment to get it back, and maybe get an order. Because of the current state of social distancing, hose days are gone or at least on hiatus for a while. On top of that, CD players are becoming scarce. It’s time to enter the digital age with this product

Today we’re introducing Supplementing Your Diet as an MP3 download. How does that help your business? You can gift an audio to others so they can listen to it. All you have to do is put in their email address on the billing page when you buy it, and they will be notified and can download it (be sure to let them know it’s coming so they don’t mistake it for spam or malware). And you can send it anywhere in the world without a thought for postage.

The price of each download is $4.95, less your Member or Insider discount (remember to log in first). If you gift them to potential clients and customers, you’re taking a calculated risk but the information really helps people understand why supplementing is critical in this day and age. I can’t sell products for you, but I can explain the benefits. Then it’s up to you.

The Bottom Line

I created Supplementing Your Diet to help people understand the benefits of supplementation and to help business owners market their product with the best of scientific research. Add it to your repertoire of digital tools to increase your bottom line today.

What are you prepared to do today?

        Dr. Chet

Cost vs. Benefit for Saturated Fat

In Tuesday’s Memo, I suggested that I don’t like speaking in absolutes when it comes to health recommendations; I’ve seen too many exceptions. What about our Michigan cardiologist? Was he correct? Yes and no, but mostly no.

He implied in the interview that the source of saturated fat is animal products. That isn’t true. In fact, someone could be a vegan and still over-consume saturated fats from using vegetable oils. Palm oil, vegetable oil, even almonds and other nuts that contain monounsaturated and polyunsaturated oils also contain saturated fats. My point is that even without any animal products such as cheese or milk, you can still get a lot of saturated fat in a vegan diet.

He was also overstating the positive effects of lowering saturated fat intake. I read the abstract; it said that it would take 56 people lowering their saturated fat intake for two years to prevent a single cardiac event. Further, the review did not show any reduction in mortality. To me, it raised a lot of questions that may have been answered but not reported.

Should we lower our saturated fat intake? Probably, but it’s going to take a lot more answers to swing the cost to benefit ratio in favor of giving up animal products for the potential benefits we may get.

What are you prepared to do today?

        Dr. Chet

Reference: Cochrane Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011737.pub2

“Give Up Meat or Else!”

“Animal Foods Conclusively Cause Heart Disease!” was the title in my news feed that attracted my attention. I had to check it out, because I’m not a fan of absolute statements in the health field; too often, some facts have to be ignored to make definitive statements such as that true. Was this any different?

A cardiologist from Michigan was interviewed in response to a recently published paper in the Cochrane Review. The review updated the information related to saturated fat intake and the rate of cardiovascular disease and mortality. After reading the paper, that’s the response the doctor gave to an interviewer from the Plant Based News. He suggested that the review conclusively shows that reducing saturated fat intake will result in a 21% decrease in CVD events. The implication is that most saturated fat comes from animal products: if we really buckle down and reduce our saturated fat consumption more, we can reduce events even further.

He makes the connection between animal products and saturated fat. But is that correct? It would mean that vegans, who consume no animal products, are protected from cardiovascular disease. Is that true? I’ll let you know on Thursday

What are you prepared to do today?

        Dr. Chet