2018’s Worst Most-Read Paper
In March of last year, the Journal of the American Medical Association published a viewpoint written by two experts in public health titled “Vitamin and Mineral Supplements. What Clinicians Need to Know”; it was one of the nutrition papers most read and most shared last year. The only problem is that clinicians really won’t find out much by reading it.
I’m going to pick one recommendation because everything after it won’t matter. The authors recommend that all clinicians recommend that patients get their nutrients from food. I absolutely agree with that. They go on to advise clinicians to tell their patients there’s no need to take any dietary supplements if they eat a healthy diet. That’s plain wrong.
We already know that over 90% of all adults do not get enough servings of vegetables, fruit, and whole grains every day—and it’s proven that food contains less nutrition than in the past—yet the authors did not recommend doing a nutrition analysis for the patient. With little to no information about the patient’s diet, clinicians are to tell their patients to eat a healthy diet, don’t take any supplements, and go on their way.
These are exceptional researchers; they know how poor the American diet is because they’ve done much of that research. To publish this opinion was incomplete in my opinion and thus it ranks as one of the worst papers of 2018. With almost a quarter million reads and shares passed along through social media and news feeds, millions read what they wrote, and it will influence millions. My opinion is that millions will be less healthy because they accepted these recommendations and dropped their nutrition insurance: their multivitamin and omega 3s and so on.
That doesn’t mean you take every dietary supplement that comes along. The rule is simple: know what supplements you take and more important, exactly why you’re taking them. And work on eating a healthier diet in 2019 as well.
What are you prepared to do today?
